4.4 Article

Does the Incremental Shuttle Walking Test require maximal effort in healthy subjects of different ages?

期刊

PHYSIOTHERAPY
卷 101, 期 2, 页码 141-146

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2014.11.002

关键词

Exercise test; Exercise tolerance; Heart rate

资金

  1. Fundacao Nacional de Desenvolvimento do Ensino Superior Particular (FUNADESP, Brazil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To evaluate if the Incremental Shuttle Walking Test (ISWT) requires maximal effort in healthy subjects of different ages. Design Cross-sectional. Setting University-based research laboratory. Participants 331 healthy subjects separated into six groups according to age: G1, 18 to 28 years; G2, 29 to 39 years; G3, 40 to 50 years; G4, 51 to 61 years; G5, 62 to 72 years and; G6, 73 to 83 years. Main outcome measures Two ISWTs were performed and participants were permitted to run and to exceed 12 levels during the test, if necessary. Heart rate (HR) and symptoms of dyspnoea and fatigue were recorded before and after the test, and the percentage of age-predicted maximal HR (HR) was calculated. Maximal effort was defined as HRma, >90% of age-predicted HRmax. Results Almost 31% of the subjects exceeded 12 levels in the ISWT. At the end of the test, all groups presented a median [interquartile range] HR greater than 90% of HRma, (G1 : 100 [95 to 104]; G2: 100 [96 to 105]; G3: 103 [97 to 108]; G4: 99 [91 to 106]; G5: 96 [87 to 106] and G6: 96 [91 to 109]% HRmax). Regarding symptoms, all groups showed higher values after the test (P < 0.05). A multiple logistic regression analysis identified female gender, older age and a lower HR before the test as determinants of not achieving 90% of HRma, at the end of the test. Conclusions The ISWT requires maximal effort in healthy individuals, but for that it is necessary to extend the test beyond twelve levels. Female gender, older age and lower heart rate before the test are the determinants of not reaching maximal effort. (C) 2014 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据