4.5 Article

The use of a novel quantitation strategy based on Reductive Isotopic Di-Ethylation (RIDE) to evaluate the effect of glufosinate on the unicellular algae Ostreococcus tauri

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
卷 74, 期 12, 页码 2798-2809

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.06.014

关键词

Ostreococcus tauri; Unicellular algae; Glufosinate; Herbicide effect; Acetaldehyde; Reductive amine

资金

  1. Centre for Systems Biology at Edinburgh (CSBE), a Centre for Integrative Systems Biology (CISB)
  2. BBSRC
  3. EPSRC [BB/D019621/1]
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D019621/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/D019621/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a novel stable-isotope labeling strategy for quantitative proteomics analysis. The method consists of labeling N-termini and lysine c-amino groups through reductive amination using acetaldehyde. This allows isotope labeling using pairs of either H-2/H-1 or C-13/C-12 without mass spectrum overlap. Our labeling procedure, which is significantly different than that developed for dimethylation, can be completed with little trace of partial ethylation; non-labeled peptides represent less than 0.05% of all peptides. Co-elution of both isotopic C-13/C-12 peptide pairs was observed in all cases, simplifying data analysis, which can be performed using standard commercial software such as Mascot Distiller. A C-13/C-12 labeled mix in a 1:1 ratio from a complex extract digest of the unicellular algae Ostreococcus tauri, showed a relative standard deviation of less than 14%. This quantitative method was used to characterize O. tauri in the presence of glufosinate, an herbicide which inhibits glutamine synthetase. Blocking glutamine synthetase significantly reduced the expression of several enzymes and transporters involved in nitrogen assimilation and the expression of a number of proteins involved in various stresses including oxidative damage response were up-regulated. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据