4.5 Review

Hydroponics on a chip: Analysis of the Fe deficient Arabidopsis thylakoid membrane proteome

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOMICS
卷 72, 期 3, 页码 397-415

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2009.01.024

关键词

Intact mass proteomics; Proteomics; Iron deficiency; Arabidopsis thaliana; Chloroplast; Thylakoids; Hydroponics; Hydroponics on a chip

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [R21 RR021913] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [5T32GM008496] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The model plant Arabidopsis thaliana was used to evaluate the thylakoid membrane proteome under Fe-deficient conditions. Plants were cultivated using a novel hydroponic system, called hydroponics on a chip, which yields highly reproducible plant tissue samples for physiological analyses, and can be easily used for in vivo stable isotope labeling. The thylakoid membrane proteome, from intact chloroplasts isolated from Fe-sufficient and Fe-deficient plants grown with hydroponics on a chip, was analyzed using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Intact masses of thylakoid membrane proteins were measured, many for the first time, and several proteins were identified with post-translational modifications that were altered by Fe deficiency; for example, the doubly phosphorylated form of the photosystem II oxygen evolving complex, PSBH, increased under Fe-deficiency. increased levels of photosystem II protein subunit PSBS were detected in the Fe-deficient samples. Antioxidant enzymes, including ascorbate peroxidase and peroxiredoxin Q were only detected in the Fe-deficient samples. We present the first biochemical evidence that the two major LHC IIb proteins (LHCB1 and LHCB2) may have significantly different functions in the thylakoid membrane. The study illustrates the utility of intact mass proteomics as an indispensable tool for functional genomics. Hydroponics on a chip provides the ability to grow A. thaliana under defined conditions that will be useful for systems biology. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据