4.7 Article

LC-MS Based Cleavage Site Profiling of the Proteases ADAM10 and ADAM17 Using Proteome-Derived Peptide Libraries

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 2205-2214

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr401135u

关键词

ADAM10; ADAM17; cleavage site specificity; PICS; Q-PICS; peptide library; TMT; MALDI MS; ESI MS

资金

  1. Proteolysis as a Regulatory Event in Pathophysiology [SFB877, BE 4086/2-1]
  2. Cluster of Excellence Inflammation at Interfaces
  3. DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Disintegrin and Metalloproteinase 10 (ADAM10) and ADAM17 catalyze ectodomain shedding of a number of cell surface proteins important for embryonic development and tissue homeostasis. Changes in the expression levels or dysregulated proteolytic activity of ADAM 10 and ADAM 17 have been shown to play important roles in multiple diseases such as inflammation, cancer, and neurodegenerative disorders. Despite the well documented substrate repertoire of ADAM10 and ADAM17, little is known about their cleavage site specificity. We optimized Q-PICS (Quantitative Proteomics for the Identification of Cleavage Sites) to elucidate the cleavage site specificity of recombinant murine ADAM10 and ADAM17. Two different yeast proteome-derived peptide libraries were used and samples were analyzed by LC-MALDI and LC-ESI MS in parallel. We show that the largest difference in the cleavage site specificities of ADAM10 and ADAM 17 is at the P1' site: while both enzymes cleave N-terminal of leucine, only ADAM10 shows additional preference toward aromatic amino acids, whereas ADAM17 exhibits the highest preference for valine. Together with further amino acid preferences more adjacent to the scissile bond, our data is in good agreement with ADAM10/17 cleavage sites previously identified in native substrates. Overall, the precise identification of ADAM10 and ADAM17 cleavage site specificity provides the basis for better substrate identification in vivo and the generation of specific inhibitors or activity based probes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据