4.7 Article

Decoding the S-Nitrosoproteomic Atlas in Individualized Human Colorectal Cancer Tissues Using a Label-Free Quantitation Strategy

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 4942-4958

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr5002675

关键词

S-nitrosylation; biotin switch; label-free quantitation; colorectal cancer

资金

  1. National Science Council in Taiwan [NSC-100-2627-M-001-003, NSC-100-2922-I-016-002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The abnormal S-nitrosylation induced by the overexpression and activation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) modulates many human diseases, such as inflammation and cancer. To delineate the pathophysiological S-nitrosoproteome in cancer patients, we report an individualized S-nitrosoproteomic strategy with a label-free method for the site-specific quantification of S-nitrosylation in paired tumor and adjacent normal tissues from 11 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This study provides not only the first endogenous human S-nitrosoproteomic atlas but also the first individualized human tissue analysis, identifying 174 S-nitrosylation sites in 94 proteins. Fourteen novel S-nitrosylation sites with a high frequency of elevated levels in 11 individual patients were identified. An individualized S-nitrosylation quantitation analysis revealed that the detected changes in S-nitrosylation were regulated by both the expression level and the more dramatic post-translational S-nitrosylation of the targeted proteins, such as thioredoxin, annexin A4, and peroxiredoxin-4. These endogenous S-nitrosylated proteins illustrate the network of inflammation/cancer-related and redox reactions mediated by various S-nitrosylation sources, including iNOS, transnitrosylase, or ironsulfur centers. Given the demonstrated sensitivity of individualized tissue analysis, this label-free approach may facilitate the study of the vastly under-represented S-nitrosoproteome and enable a better understanding of the effect of endogenous S-nitrosylation in cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据