4.7 Article

Muscle Proteomics Reveals Novel Insights into the Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Collagen VI Myopathies

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 5022-5030

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr500675e

关键词

Collagen VI; Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy; Bethlem myopathy; 2D-DIGE; endoplasmic reticulum; unfolded protein response; hexosamine; alpha-ketoglutarate

资金

  1. EC
  2. FP7 BIO-NMD project [241665]
  3. Telethon Foundation [GGP08017D, GGP110827]
  4. MRC [MR/K000608/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/K000608/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in the collagen VI genes cause the Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy (UCMD), with severe phenotype, and Bethlem myopathy (BM) with mild to moderate phenotype. Both, UCMD and BM patients show dystrophic features with degeneration/regeneration and replacement of muscle with fat and fibrous connective tissue. At molecular level, UCMD patients show autophagic impairment and increased PTP opening; these features are less severe in BM. To elucidate the biochemical mechanisms adopted by the muscle to adapt to collagen VI deficiency in BM and UCMD patients, a proteome analysis was carried out on human muscle biopsies. Qualitative and quantitative differences were assessed by 2D-DIGE coupled to MALDI-ToF/ToF MS. Proteomics results, coupled with immunoblotting, indicate changes in UPR, hexosamine pathway, and amino acid and fatty acid metabolism, suggesting an association of ER stress, metabolic dysregulation, autophagic impairment, and alteration in mechanotransduction signaling. Overall, these results indicate that despite the common downregulation of hexosamine pathway in UCMD and BM, in BM the protein quality control system is sustained by a metabolic adaptation supporting energy requirements for the maintenance of autophagy, counteracting ER misfolded protein overload. In UCMD, this multilayered system may be disrupted and worsened by the metabolic rewiring, which leads to lipotoxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据