4.7 Article

Lysine Methylation Mapping of Crenarchaeal DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases by Collision-Induced and Electron-Transfer Dissociation Mass Spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 2637-2648

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr500084p

关键词

Sulfolobus; RNA polymerase; methylation; acetylation; ETD; CID; post-translational modification

资金

  1. CIC bioGUNE
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [BFU2012-33947]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enzymatic machineries fundamental for information processing (e.g., transcription, replication, translation) in Archaea are simplified versions of their eukaryotic counterparts. This is clearly noticeable in the conservation of sequence and structure of corresponding enzymes (see for example the archaeal DNA-directed RNA polymerase (RNAP)). In Eukarya, post-translational modifications (PTMs) often serve as functional regulatory factors for various enzymes and complexes. Among the various PTMs, methylation and acetylation have been recently attracting most attention. Nevertheless, little is known about such PTMs in Archaea, and cross-methodological studies are scarce. We examined methylation and N-terminal acetylation of endogenously purified crenarchaeal RNA polymerase from Sulfolobus shibatae (Ssh) and Sulfolobus acidocaldarius (Sac). In-gel and in-solution protein digestion methods were combined with collision-induced dissociation (CID) and electron-transfer dissociation (ETD) mass spectrometry analysis. Overall, 20 and 26 methyl-lysines for S. shibatae and S. acidocaldarius were identified, respectively. Furthermore, two N-terminal acetylation sites for each of these organisms were assessed. As a result, we generated a high-confidence data set for the mapping of methylation and acetylation sites in both Sulfolobus species, allowing comparisons with the data previously obtained for RNAP from Sulfolobus solfataricus (Sso). We confirmed that all observed methyl-lysines are on the surface of the RNAP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据