4.7 Article

Nuclear Cytoplasmic Trafficking of Proteins is a Major Response of Human Fibroblasts to Oxidative Stress

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 4398-4423

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr500638h

关键词

quantitative proteomics; mass spectrometry; SILAC; oxidative stress; peroxide; DNA replication

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [081879/z/06/z]
  2. King Abdullah Al Saud Foreign Scholarship Program
  3. Saudi Ministry of Higher Education
  4. Wellcome Trust [081879/Z/06/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have used a subcellular spatial razor approach based on LC-MS/MS-based proteomics with SILAC isotope labeling to determine changes in protein abundances in the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments of human IMR90 fibroblasts subjected to mild oxidative stress. We show that response to mild tert-butyl hydrogen peroxide treatment includes redistribution between the nucleus and cytoplasm of numerous proteins not previously associated with oxidative stress. The 121 proteins with the most significant changes encompass proteins with known functions in a wide variety of subcellular locations and of cellular functional processes (transcription, signal transduction, autophagy, iron metabolism, TCA cycle, ATP synthesis) and are consistent with functional networks that are spatially dispersed across the cell. Both nuclear respiratory factor 2 and the proline regulatory axis appear to contribute to the cellular metabolic response. Proteins involved in iron metabolism or with iron/heme as a cofactor as well as mitochondrial proteins are prominent in the response. Evidence suggesting that nuclear import/export and vesicle-mediated protein transport contribute to the cellular response was obtained. We suggest that measurements of global changes in total cellular protein abundances need to be complemented with measurements of the dynamic subcellular spatial redistribution of proteins to obtain comprehensive pictures of cellular function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据