4.7 Article

Panorama: A Targeted Proteomics Knowledge Base

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 4205-4210

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr5006636

关键词

Software; knowledge base; mass spectrometry; targeted proteomics; SRM; MRM; chromatogram libraries; skyline

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [R01 GM103551, U01 CA164186]
  2. National Cancer Institute Clinical Proteomics Tumor Analysis Consortium Initiative [U24 CA160034]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HHSN268201000033C, R01HL096738]
  4. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Panorama is a web application for storing, sharing, analyzing, and reusing targeted assays created and refined with Skyline,(1) an increasingly popular Windows client software tool for targeted proteomics experiments. Panorama allows laboratories to store and organize curated results contained in Skyline documents with fine-grained permissions, which facilitates distributed collaboration and secure sharing of published and unpublished data via a web-browser interface. It is fully integrated with the Skyline workflow and supports publishing a document directly to a Panorama server from the Skyline user interface. Panorama captures the complete Skyline document information content in a relational database schema. Curated results published to Panorama can be aggregated and exported as chromatogram libraries. These libraries can be used in Skyline to pick optimal targets in new experiments and to validate peak identification of target peptides. Panorama is open-source and freely available. It is distributed as part of LabKey Server,(2) an open source biomedical research data management system. Laboratories and organizations can set up Panorama locally by downloading and installing the software on their own servers. They can also request freely hosted projects on https://panoramaweb.org a Panorama server maintained by the Department of Genome Sciences at the University of Washington.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据