4.7 Article

Hydrophilic Strong Anion Exchange (hSAX) Chromatography for Highly Orthogonal Peptide Separation of Complex Proteomes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 2449-2457

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr301011r

关键词

ultralow hydrophobicity; chromatography; proteomics; strong anion exchange; hydrophilic strong anion exchange; HPLC; mouse macrophage; RAW264.7; orthogonality; mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Medical Research Council (MRC) UK
  2. Scottish Institute for Cell Signaling (SCILLS)
  3. MRC [MC_UU_12016/5, G1100713, MC_UP_A500_1020] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G1100713, MC_UP_A500_1020, MC_UU_12016/5] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to its compatibility and orthogonality to reversed phase (RP) liquid chromatography (LC) separation, ion exchange chromatography, and mainly strong,cation exchange (SCX), has often been the first choice in multidimensional LC experiments in proteomics. Here, we have tested the ability of three strong anion exchanger (SAX) columns differing in their hydrophobicity to fractionate RAW264.7 macrophage cell lysate. IonPac AS24, a strong anion exchange material with ultralow hydrophobicity, demonstrated to be superior to other materials by fractionation and separation of tryptic peptides from both a mixture of 6 proteins as well as mouse cell lysate. The chromatography displayed very high orthogonality and high robustness depending on the hydrophilicity of column chemistry, macrophage cell lysate digest resulted in an identification of 9469 unique proteins and 126318 distinct peptides in one week of instrument time. Moreover, when compared to an optimized high pH/low pH RP separation approach, the method presented here raised the identification of proteins and peptides by 10 and 28%, respectively. This novel hSAX approach provides robust, reproducible, and highly orthogonal separation of complex protein digest samples for deep coverage proteome analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据