4.7 Article

Comparative Proteomics Reveal Diverse Functions and Dynamic Changes of Bombyx mori Silk Proteins Spun from Different Development Stages

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 5213-5222

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr4005772

关键词

silk; fibroin; sericin; protease inhibitor; enzyme; proteomics; Bombyx mori

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB114600]
  2. National Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2011AA100306]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31172157]
  4. Science and Technology Innovation Foundation for Graduate Students of Southwest University of China [kb2010003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silkworms (Bombyx mori) produce massive amounts of silk proteins to make cocoons during the final stages of larval development. Although the major components, fibroin and sericin, have been the focus for a long time, few researchers have realized the complexity of the silk proteome. We collected seven kinds of silk fibers spun by silkworm larvae at different developmental stages: the silks spun by new hatched larvae, second instar day 0 larvae, third instar day 0 larvae, fourth instar day 0 larvae, and fourth instar molting larvae, the scaffold silk used to attach the cocoon to the substrate and the cocoon silk. Analysis by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry identified 500 proteins from the seven silks. In addition to the expected fibroins, sericins, and some known protease inhibitors, we also identified further protease inhibitors, enzymes, proteins of unknown function, and other proteins. Unsurprisingly, our quantitative results showed fibroins and sericins were the most abundant proteins in all seven silks. Except for fibroins and sericins, protease inhibitors, enzymes, and proteins of unknown function were more abundant than other proteins. We found significant change in silk protein compositions through development, being consistent with their different biological functions and complicated formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据