4.7 Article

Identification of Autoantigens in Body Fluids by Combining Pull-Downs and Organic Precipitations of Intact Immune Complexes with Quantitative Label-Free Mass Spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 12, 页码 5656-5665

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr4005986

关键词

autoantibody; autoantigen; autoimmune uveitis; label-free mass spectrometry; Progenesis LC-MS; acetonitrile precipitation

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 571/A5 Deeg]
  2. DFG [DE 719/4-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most autoimmune diseases are multifactorial diseases and are caused by the immunological reaction against a number of autoantigens. Key for understanding autoimmune pathologies is the knowledge of the targeted autoantigens, both initially and during disease progression. We present an approach for autoantigen identification based on isolation of intact autoantibody antigen complexes from body fluids. After organic precipitation of high molecular weight proteins and free immunoglobulins, released autoantigens were identified by quantitative label-free liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. We confirmed feasibility of target enrichment and identification from highly complex body fluid proteomes by spiking of a predefined antibody antigen complex at low level of abundance. As a proof of principle, we studied the blinding disease autoimmune uveitis, which is caused by autoreactive T-cells attacking the inner eye and is accompanied by autoantibodies. We identified three novel autoantigens in the spontaneous animal model equine recurrent uveitis (secreted acidic phosphoprotein osteopontin, extracellular matrix protein 1, and metalloproteinase inhibitor 2) and confirmed the presence of the corresponding autoantibodies in 15-25% of patient samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Thus, this workflow led to the identification of novel autoantigens in autoimmune uveitis and may provide a versatile and useful tool to identify autoantigens in other autoimmune diseases in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据