4.7 Article

Quantitative Proteomics Reveals Oxygen-Dependent Changes in Neuronal Mitochondria Affecting Function and Sensitivity to Rotenone

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 4599-4606

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr400758d

关键词

mitochondria; neurodegeneration; oxidative stress; bioenergetics/electron transfer complex; hypoxia; hyperoxia

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [MH073490, MH062261]
  2. Nebraska Tobacco Settlement Biomedical Research Development Funds
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondria are implicated in a variety of degenerative disorders and aging. Mitochondria are responsive to the oxygen in their environment, yet tissue culture is performed at atmospheric (21%) oxygen and not at physiological (1-11%) oxygen levels found in tissues. We employed imaging of mitochondrial probes, mass spectrometry, Western blots, and ATP assays of the human neuroblastoma cell-line SH-SY5Y and imaging of mitochondria] probes in human primary neurons under standard nonphysiological oxygen conditions (atmospheric) and under physiological oxygen levels in the nervous system to assess the impact of oxygen on mitochondrial function. SH-SY5Y cells cultured in physiological 5% oxygen exhibited the lowest reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, indicating that culture at 5% oxygen is favored; these results were mimicked in primary human cells. Mass spectrometric analysis revealed extensive mitochondrial proteomic alterations in SH-SY5Y cells based on oxygen culture condition. Among these, the rotenone-sensitive subunit of complex I NDUFV3 was increased in cells cultured at 5% oxygen. Rotenone is a Parkinson's disease-linked toxin, and correspondingly SH-SY5Y cells cultured at 5% oxygen also exhibited over 10 times greater sensitivity to rotenone than those cultured in atmospheric, 21%, oxygen. Our results indicate that neuronal mitochondria are responsive to oxygen levels and produce differential responses under different oxygen levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据