4.7 Article

Quantitative Analysis of the Human AKR Family Members in Cancer Cell Lines Using the mTRAQ/MRM Approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 2022-2033

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr301153z

关键词

MRM; AKR; mTRAQ labeling absolute quantification; cancer cell lines

资金

  1. Guangdong Innovative Research Team Program [2009010016]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2010CB912703]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2012AA020204]
  4. Nature Science Foundation of China [91131009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Members of human aldo-keto reductase (AKR) superfamily have been reported to be involved in cancer progression, whereas the final conclusion is not generally accepted. Herein, we propose a quantitative method to measure human AKR proteins in cells using mTRAQ-based multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). AKR peptides with multiple transitions were carefully selected upon tryptic digestion of the recombinant AKR proteins, while AKR proteins were identified by SDS-PAGE fractionation coupled with LC-MS/MS. Utilizing mTRAQ triplex labeling to Produce the derivative peptides, calibration curves were generated using the mixed lysate as background, and no significantly different quantification of AKRs was elicited from the two sets of calibration curves under the mixed and single lysate as background. We employed this approach to quantitatively determine the 6 AKR proteins, AKR1A1, AKR1B1, AKR1B10, AKR1C1/C2, AKR1C3, and AKR1C4, in 7 different cancer cell lines and for the first time to obtain the absolute quantities of all the AKR proteins in each cell. The cluster plot revealed that AKR1A and AKR1B were widely distributed in most cancer cells with relatively stable abundances, whereas AKR1Cs were unevenly detected among these cells with diverse dynamic abundances. The AKR quantitative distribution in different cancer cells, therefore, may assist further exploration toward how the AKR proteins are involved in tumorigenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据