4.7 Article

An iTRAQ Proteomics Screen Reveals the Effects of the MDM2 Binding Ligand Nutlin-3 on Cellular Proteostasis

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 5464-5478

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr300698d

关键词

MDM2; Nutlin-3; iTRAQ interactome; NPM; proteostasis; protein-protein interactions; quantitative proteomics

资金

  1. EPSRC/BBSRC
  2. TATA leukemia research fund (U.K.)
  3. NHMRC Career Development Award
  4. Australian Government's NCRIS/EIF programs
  5. Cancer Research UK

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) participates in protein synthesis, folding, and ubiquitin-mediated degradation and is therefore a proteostasic hub protein. The MDM2 interactome contains over 100 proteins, yet stratification of dominant MDM2-interacting proteins has not been achieved. 8-plex iTRAQ(nanoLC-MS/MS) of MCF7 cells treated with the MDM2-binding ligand Nutlin-3 identified the most abundant cellular protein changes over early time points; 1,323 unique proteins were identified including 35 with altered steady-state levels within 2 h of Nutlin-3 treatment, identifying a core group of MDM2 related proteins. Six of these proteins were previously identified MDM2 interactors, and the effects of Nutlin-3 on the MDM2-nucleophosmin interaction (NPM) was further validated This revealed that Nutlin-3 mediates the in vivo conversion of NPM from an oligomer to a monomer as an MDM2-dependent phenomenon, with Nutlin-3 stimulating MDM2 binding to a peptide motif derived from the oligomerization interface of NPM. These data form the first proteomic screen of Nutlin-3 in cells whereby we (i) identify the most abundant MDM2-interacting proteins whose steady-state levels change early after Nutlin-3 treatment; (ii) identify the first protein apart from 1)53, nucleophosmin (NPM), whose interaction with MDM2 can be stimulated allosterically by Nutlin-3; and (iii) raise the possibility that Nutlin-3 might act as a general agonist of other MDM2 protein protein interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据