4.7 Article

Proteomic Analysis Reveals Warburg Effect and Anomalous Metabolism of Glutamine in Pancreatic Cancer Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 554-563

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr2009274

关键词

mass spectrometry; proteomics; pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; metabolism; Warburg effect; glutamine

资金

  1. Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) [5548]
  2. Fondazione San Paolo
  3. Ministero della Salute: Progetto integrato Oncologia
  4. Regione Piemonte: Ricerca Industriale e Sviluppo Precompetitivo (BIOPRO and ONCOPROT)
  5. Ricerca Industriale Converging Technologies (BIOTHER)
  6. Progetti strategici su tematiche di interesse regionale o sovra regionale (IMMONC)
  7. Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata
  8. Ricerca Sanitaria Applicata
  9. European Pancreatic Cancer-Tumor-Microenvironment Network (EPC-TM-Net) [256974]
  10. Ministero dell'Istruzione e della Ricerca
  11. Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale (MIUR PRIN)
  12. College of Science at George Mason University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this present work, we characterized the proteomes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cell line PANC-1 and normal pancreatic duct cells by mass spectrometry using LTQ-Orbitrap and identified more than 1700 proteins from each sample. On the basis of the spectra count label-free quantification approach, we identified a large number of differentially expressed metabolic enzymes and proteins involved in cytoskeleton, cell adhesion, transport, transcription, translation, and cell proliferation as well. The data demonstrated that metabolic pathways were altered in PANC-1, consistent with the Warburg effect. In addition, the comparative MS analysis unveiled anomalous metabolism of glutamine, suggesting that glutamine was largely consumed as a nitrogen donor in nucleotide and amino acid biosynthesis in PANC-1. Our analysis provides a potentially comprehensive picture of metabolism in PANC-1, which may serve as the basis of new diagnostics and treatment of PDAC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据