4.7 Article

Glycoprotein Profiles of Human Breast Cells Demonstrate a Clear Clustering of Normal/Benign versus Malignant Cell Lines and Basal versus Luminal Cell Lines

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 656-667

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr201041j

关键词

breast cancer; glycoproteomics; protein networks; differential expression; nonmalignant vs malignant; luminal vs basal; hydrazide-modified magnetic beads; label-free quantitation; spectral counts; hierarchical clustering

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P20 MD000544]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHEM-0619163]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gene expression profiling has defined molecular subtypes of breast cancer including those identified as luminal and basal. To determine if glycoproteins distinguish various subtypes of breast cancer, we obtained glycoprotein profiles from 14 breast cell lines. Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis demonstrated that the glycoprotein profiles obtained can serve as molecular signatures to classify subtypes of breast cancer, as well as to distinguish normal and benign breast cells from breast cancer cells. Statistical analyses were used to identify glycoproteins that are overexpressed in normal versus cancer breast cells, and those that are overexpressed in luminal versus basal breast cancer. Among the glycoproteins distinguishing normal breast cells from cancer cells are several proteins known to be involved in cell adhesion, including proteins previously identified as being altered in breast cancer. Basal breast cancer cell lines overexpressed a number of CD antigens, including several integrin subunits, relative to luminal breast cancer cell lines, whereas luminal breast cancer cells overexpressed carbonic anhydrase 12, clusterin, and cell adhesion molecule 1. The differential expression of glycoproteins in these breast cancer cell lines readily allows the classification of the lines into normal, benign, malignant, basal, and luminal groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据