4.7 Article

pNovo: De novo Peptide Sequencing and Identification Using HCD Spectra

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 2713-2724

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr100182k

关键词

tandem mass spectrometry; HCD; de novo sequencing; pNovo

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research & Development Program (973) of China [2010CB912701, 2002CB713807]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program (863) of China [2007AA027315, 2008AA02Z309]
  3. CAS [KGGX1-YW-13]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30900262]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

De novo peptide sequencing has improved remarkably in the past decade as a result of better instruments and computational algorithms. However, de novo sequencing can correctly interpret only similar to 30% of high- and medium-quality spectra generated by collision-induced dissociation (CID), which is much less than database search. This is mainly due to incomplete fragmentation and overlap of different ion series in CID spectra. In this study, we show that higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) is of great help to de novo sequencing because it produces high mass accuracy tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) spectra without the low-mass cutoff associated with CID in ion trap instruments. Besides, abundant internal and immonium ions in the HCD spectra can help differentiate similar peptide sequences. Taking advantage of these characteristics, we developed an algorithm called pNovo for efficient de novo sequencing of peptides from HCD spectra. pNovo gave correct identifications to 80% or more of the HCD spectra identified by database search. The number of correct full-length peptides sequenced by pNovo is comparable with that obtained by database search. A distinct advantage of de novo sequencing is that deamidated peptides and peptides with amino acid mutations can be identified efficiently without extra cost in computation. In summary, implementation of the HCD characteristics makes pNovo an excellent tool for de novo peptide sequencing from HCD spectra.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据