4.7 Article

In-Depth Proteomic Analyses of Direct Expressed Prostatic Secretions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 2109-2116

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr1001498

关键词

prostate cancer; expressed prostatic secretions; proteomics; biomarker; proximal fluid

资金

  1. Canadian Research Chairs Program
  2. Prostate Cancer Canada [2009-454]
  3. Canadian Institute of Health Research [MOP-93772]
  4. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA135087, R21 CA137704, U01 CA085067]
  5. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care
  6. Paul Starita Graduate Student Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is expected that clinically obtainable fluids that are proximal to organs contain a repertoire of secreted proteins and shed cells reflective of the physiological state of that tissue and thus represent potential sources for biomarker discovery, investigation of tissue-specific biology, and assay development. The prostate gland secretes many proteins into a prostatic fluid that combines with seminal vesicle fluids to promote sperm activation and function. Proximal fluids of the prostate that can be collected clinically are seminal plasma and expressed prostatic secretion (EPS) fluids. In the current study, MudPIT-based proteomics was applied to EPS obtained from nine men with prostate cancer and resulted in the confident identification of 916 unique proteins. Systematic bioinformatics analyses using publicly available microarray data of 21 human tissues (Human Gene Atlas), the Human Protein Atlas database, and other published proteomics data of shed/secreted proteins were performed to systematically analyze this comprehensive proteome. Therefore, we believe this data will be a valuable resource for the research community to study prostate biology and potentially assist in the identification of novel prostate cancer biomarkers. To further streamline this process, the entire data set was deposited to the Tranche repository for use by other researchers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据