4.7 Article

Comparative Proteomics of Salt Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Thellungiella halophila

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 2584-2599

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr100034f

关键词

salt tolerance; Arabidopsis thaliana; Thellungiella halophila; 2D gel; 8-plex iTRAQ; LC-MS/MS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salinity is a major abiotic stress affecting plant cultivation and productivity. Thellungiella halophila is a halophyte and has been used as a model for studying plant salt tolerance. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of salinity tolerance will facilitate the generation of salt tolerant crops. Here we report comparative leaf proteomics of Arabidopsis, a glycophyte, and its close relative Thellungiella, a halophyte, under different salt stress conditions. Proteins from control and NaCl treated Arabidopsis and Thellungiella leaf samples were extracted and separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. A total of 88 protein spots from Arabidopsis gels and 37 protein spots from Thellungiella gels showed significant changes. Out of these spots, a total of 79 and 32 proteins were identified by mass spectrometry in Arabidopsis and Thellungiella, respectively. Most of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthesis, energy metabolism, and stress response in Arabidopsis and Thellungiella. As a complementary approach, isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) LC-MS was used to identify crude microsomal proteins. A total of 31 and 32 differentially expressed proteins were identified in Arabidopsis and Thellungiella under salt treatment, respectively. Overall, there were more proteins changed in abundance in Arabidopsis than in Thellungiella. Distinct patterns of protein changes in the two species were observed. Collectively, this work represents the most extensive proteomic description of salinity responses of Arabidopsis and Thellungiella and has improved our knowledge of salt tolerance in glycophytes and halophytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据