4.7 Article

Protein Kinase-Inhibitor Database: Structural Variability of and Inhibitor Interactions with the Protein Kinase P-Loop

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 9, 期 9, 页码 4433-4442

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr100662s

关键词

distorted P-loop; hydrophobic motif; AGC kinase [cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA)/protein; kinase G/protein kinase C (PKC)]; kinase structure space; atom preference; conformational plasticity

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EPS-0556308, EPS-0903787]
  2. NIH National Center for Research Resources [C06 RR-14503-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Structure-based drug design of protein-kinase inhibitors has been facilitated by availability of an enormous number of structures in the Protein Databank (PDB), systematic analyses of which can provide insight into the factors that govern ligand-protein kinase interactions and into the conformational variability of the protein kinases. In this study, a nonredundant database containing 755 unique, curated, and annotated PDB protein kinase-inhibitor complexes (each consisting of a single protein kinase chain, a ligand, and water molecules around the ligand) was created. With this dataset, analyses were performed of protein conformational variability and interactions of ligands with 11 P-loop residues. Analysis of ligand-protein interactions included ligand atom preference, ligand-protein hydrogen bonds, and the number and position of crystallographic water molecules around important P-loop residues. Analysis of variability in the conformation of the P-loop considered backbone and side-chain dihedral angles, and solvent accessible surface area (SASA). A distorted conformation of the P-loop was observed for some of the protein kinase structures. Lower SASA was observed for the hydrophobic residue in of several members of the AGC family of protein kinases. Our systematic studies were performed amino acid-by-amino acid, which is unusual for analyses of protein kinase-inhibitor complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据