4.7 Article

Combined Proteomic and Transcriptomic Analysis Identifies Differentially Expressed Pathways Associated to Pinus radiata Needle Maturation

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 3954-3979

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr1001669

关键词

Pinus radiata; proteomics; transcriptomics; needle development

资金

  1. Spanish National [AGL2004-00810/FOR, AGL2007-62907/FOR]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Needle differentiation is a very complex process that leads to the formation of a mature photosynthetic organ from pluripotent needle primordia. The proteome and transcriptome of immature and fully developed needles of Pinus radiata D. Don were compared to described changes in mRNA and protein species that characterize the needle maturation developmental process. A total of 856 protein spots were analyzed, defining a total of 280 spots as differential between developmental stages, from which 127 were confidently identified. A suppressive subtractive library (2048 clones, 274 non redundant contigs) was built, and 176 genes showed to be differentially expressed. The Joint data analysis of proteomic and transcriptomic results provided a broad overview of differentially expressed pathways associated with needle maturation and stress-related pathways. Proteins and genes related to energy metabolism pathways, photosynthesis, and oxidative phosphorylation were overexpressed in mature needles. Amino acid metabolism, transcription, and translation pathways were overexpressed in immature needles. Interestingly, stress related proteins were characteristic of immature tissues, a fact that may be linked to defense mechanisms and the higher growth rate and morphogenetic competence exhibited by these needles. Thus, this work provides an overview of the molecular changes affecting proteomes and transcriptomes during P. radiata needle maturation, having an integrative vision of the functioning and physiology of this process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据