4.7 Article

Classification of HER2 Receptor Status in Breast Cancer Tissues by MALDI Imaging Mass Spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 1854-1863

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr901008d

关键词

HER2 testing; MALDI imaging; molecular classification; breast cancer; CRIP1

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Germany [01EZ0803, 0101-31P5873]
  2. European Commission [LSI-IC-CT-2004-503426]
  3. Deutsche Krebshilfe [108096]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 824]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical laboratory testing for HER2 status in breast cancer tissues is critically important for therapeutic decision making. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) is a powerful tool for investigating proteins through the direct and morphology-driven analysis of tissue sections. We hypothesized that MALDI-IMS may determine HER2 status directly from breast cancer tissues. Breast cancer tissues (n = 48) predefined for HER2 status were subjected to MALDI-IMS, and protein profiles were obtained through direct analysis of tissue sections. Protein identification was performed by tissue microextraction and fractionation followed by top-down tandem mass spectrometry. A discovery and an independent validation set were used to predict HER2 status by applying proteomic classification algorithms. We found that specific protein/peptide expression changes strongly correlated with the HER2 overexpression. Among these, we identified m/z 8404 as cysteine-rich intestinal protein 1. The proteomic signature was able to accurately define HER2-positive from HER2-negative tissues, achieving high values for sensitivity of 83%, for specificity of 92%, and an overall accuracy of 89%. Our results underscore the potential of MALDI-IMS proteomic algorithms for morphology-driven tissue diagnostics such as HER2 testing and show that MALDI-IMS can reveal biologically significant molecular details from tissues which are not limited to traditional high-abundance proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据