4.7 Article

Proteome Changes in Human Monocytes upon Interaction with Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate Crystals

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 3980-3988

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr100174a

关键词

calcium oxalate; CaOx; COM; monocytes; proteome; proteomics

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund
  2. Commission on Higher Education
  3. Mahidol University
  4. National Research Council of Thailand
  5. Siriraj Graduate Thesis Scholarship
  6. Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program scholarship
  7. Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monocytic infiltration in renal interstitium is commonly found surrounding the site of calcium oxalate (CaOx) crystal deposition in the kidney. Monocytes are supposed to eliminate the deposited crystals. However, effects of CaOx crystals on the infiltrating monocytes remain unknown. Therefore, this study investigated the altered cellular proteome of human monocytes in response to interaction with CaOx monohydrate (COM) crystals. After 24-h culture with or without 100 mu g/mL COM crystals, U937 cells were harvested and subjected to 2-DE analysis with Deep Purple fluorescence staining (n = 5 gels/group; each was derived from independent culture). Spot matching, quantitative intensity analysis, and statistics revealed 22 differentially expressed proteins (9 up-regulated and 13 down-regulated proteins), which were successfully identified by Q-TOF MS and MS/MS analyses, including those involved in cell cycle, cellular structure, carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism, mRNA processing, and protein synthesis, stabilization, and degradation. Randomly selected changes [up-regulated ALG-2 interacting protein 1 (Alix), elongation factor-2 (EF-2), and down-regulated beta-actin] were confirmed by Western blot analysis. Our data may help to understand how monocytes interact with COM crystals. These processes are proposed to cause subsequent inflammatory response in kidney stone disease through oxidative stress pathway(s).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据