4.7 Article

Use of 32P To Study Dynamics of the Mitochondrial Phosphoproteome

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 2679-2695

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr800913j

关键词

P-32; mitochondria; protein phosphorylation; phosphate-metabolite association; 2D gel electrophoresis; Complex I; Complex V

资金

  1. Division of Intramural Research
  2. Intramural Research Division of the NHLBI
  3. NIH [DK47844]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein phosphorylation is a well-characterized regulatory mechanism in the cytosol, but remains poorly defined in the mitochondrion. In this study, we characterized the use of P-32-labeling to monitor the turnover of protein phosphorylation in the heart and liver mitochondria matrix. The UP labeling technique was compared and contrasted to Phos-tag protein phosphorylation fluorescent stain and 2D isoelectric focusing. Of the 64 proteins identified by MS spectroscopy in the Phos-Tag gels, over 20 proteins were correlated with (32)p labeling. The high sensitivity of (32)p incorporation detected proteins well below the mass spectrometry and even 2D gel protein detection limits. Phosphate-chase experiments revealed both turnover and phosphate associated protein pool size alterations dependent on initial incubation conditions. Extensive weak phosphate/phosphate metabolite interactions were observed using nondisruptive native gels, providing a novel approach to screen for potential allosteric interactions of phosphate metabolites with matrix proteins. We confirmed the phosphate associations in Complexes V and I due to their critical role in oxidative phosphorylation and to validate the 2D methods. These complexes were isolated by immunocapture, after (32)p labeling in the intact mitochondria, and revealed P-32-incorporation for the alpha, beta, gamma, OSCP, and d subunits in Complex V and the 75, 51, 42, 23, and 13a kDa subunits in Complex I. These results demonstrate that a dynamic and extensive mitochondrial matrix phosphoproteome exists in heart and liver.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据