4.5 Article

Cortisol and pain-related behavior in disbudded goat kids with and without cornual nerve block

期刊

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 58-61

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.10.026

关键词

Disbudding; Goat kid; Welfare; Pain; Plasma cortisol; Local anesthesia; Behavioral response

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasma cortisol and behavior were measured in disbudded goat kids with and without the use of cornual nerve block. A total of 45 kids were used in 5 experimental groups (n = 9, males and females). Group LidoD was infiltrated with 1 mL of 2% lidocaine locally at the cornual branches of lacrimal and infratrochlear nerves, 15 min before thermal disbudding. Group Lido was similarly infiltrated and was not disbudded. In group Sim, the disbudding procedure was simulated. A control group (CD) was disbudded without lidocaine infiltration, and group SD was infiltrated with saline before disbudding. The cornual nerve block did not prevent the short-term increase in cortisol levels during and after disbudding. LidoD, CD and SD groups showed higher cortisol concentrations than Lido and Sim (p < 0.05) during the first 20 min after the procedure. Frequency of vocalizations during the procedure was significantly different between groups and was higher in SD (29.6 +/- 3.1; mean +/- SE) and CD (28.4 +/- 3.1) than in Sim (16.6 +/- 3.1; p < 0.05). Infiltrating lidocaine did not decrease this response to disbudding (21.1 +/- 3.1; p > 0.05). Struggles tended to be higher in SD (16.5 +/- 2.5), CD (17.8 +/- 2.5) and LidoD (15.6 +/- 2.5) than Sim (10.6 +/- 2.5; p = 0.1). The total behavioral response was different between groups (CD, 59.6 +/- 6.8; LidoD, 52 +/- 6.8; SD, 62.6 +/- 6.8; Sim, 36.8 +/- 6.8; p = 0.05), and disbudded animals showed the strongest reactions (disbudded, 58.1 +/- 3.9 vs non-disbudded, 36.8 +/- 6.8; p = 0.01). It was concluded that cornual nerve block (lacrimal and infratrochlear) using 2% lidocaine did not prevent pain during thermal disbudding of goat kids. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据