4.7 Article

Detection of ricin in complex samples by immunocapture and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 4154-4163

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr8003437

关键词

ricin; proteolysis; bioterrorism; mass spectrometry; antibody

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ricin, the toxin component of Ricinus communis is considered as a potential chemical weapon. Several complementary techniques are required to confirm its presence in environmental samples. Here, we report a method combining immunocapture and analysis by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for the accurate detection of different species of R. communis. Liquid environmental samples were applied to magnetic particles coated with a monoclonal antibody directed against the B-chain of the toxin. After acidic elution, tryptic peptides of the A- and B-chains were obtained by accelerated digestion with trypsin in the presence of acetonitrile. Of the 20 peptides observed by MALDI-TOF MS, three were chosen for detection (m/z 1013.6, m/z 1310.6 and m/z 1728.9, which correspond to peptides 161-LEQLAGNLR-169, 150-YTFAFGGNYDR-160, and 233-SAPDPSVITLENSWGR-248, respectively). Their selection was based on several parameters such as detection sensitivity, specificity toward ricin forms and absence of isotopic overlap with unrelated peptides. To increase assay reproducibility, stable isotope-labeled peptides were incorporated during the sample preparation phase. The final assay has a limit of detection estimated at similar to 50 ng/mL (similar to 0.8 nM) of ricin in buffer. No interference was observed when the assay was applied to ricin-spiked milk samples. In addition, several varieties of R. communis or from different geographical origins were also shown to be detectable. The present assay provides a new tool with a total analytical time of similar to 5 h, which is particularly relevant in the context of a bioterrorist incident.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据