4.7 Article

Proteomics-based identification of HSP60 as a tumor-associated antigen in early stage breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 3830-3837

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr800130d

关键词

tumor-associated antigen; autoantibodies; serum marker; early breast cancer; HSP60

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The detection of autoantibodies in cancer patients has been shown to constitute an excellent tool for early diagnosis. Because breast cancer still lacks early diagnostic markers, we investigated novel tumor-associated antigens and related autoantibodies in sera from patients with early stage breast cancer compared to autoimmune disease, other cancers, and healthy volunteers, using a proteomics-based approach. Among the 26 protein antigens specifically recognized by early stage breast cancer sera, we focused on Heat Shock Protein 60 (HSP60). Using ELISA, we investigated the frequency of autoantibodies directed against this protein in the sera of 240 individuals, comprising patients with either ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n = 49) or early stage breast cancer (n = 58), other cancers (n = 20), autoimmune disease (n = 20), and healthy subjects (n = 93). Autoantibodies directed against HSP60 were present in 16/49 (31%) early stage breast cancer and 18/58 (32.6%) DCIS patients, compared to 4/93 (4.3%) healthy subjects. In particular, autoantibodies were present in 11/23 patients (47.8%) with high-grade DCIS, compared to 5/26 (19.2%) with low-grade DCIS. HSP60 mRNA levels were significantly higher in primary breast cancer compared to healthy breast tissues. Using immunohistochemistry, we found that HSP60 expression gradually increases from normal through DCIS to invasive tissues. Our results indicate that HSP60 autoantibodies may be of interest in terms of clinical utility for the early diagnosis of breast cancer and more particularly in DCIS. Moreover, HSP60 overexpression during the first steps of breast carcinogenesis may be functionally correlated to tumor growth and/or progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据