4.2 Article

Developmental Critical Windows and Sensitive Periods as Three-Dimensional Constructs in Time and Space

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL ZOOLOGY
卷 88, 期 2, 页码 91-102

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/679906

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-1025823]
  2. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1025823] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A critical window (sensitive period) represents a period during development when an organism's phenotype is responsive to intrinsic or extrinsic (environmental) factors. Such windows represent a form of developmental phenotypic plasticity and result from the interaction between genotype and environment. Critical windows have typically been defined as comprising discrete periods in development with a distinct starting time and end time, as identified by experiments following an on and an off protocol. Yet in reality, periods of responsiveness during development are likely more ambiguous that depicted. Our goal is to extend the concept of the developmental critical window by introducing a three-dimensional construct in which time during development, dose of the stressor applied, and the resultant phenotypic modification can be utilized to more realistically define a critical window. Using the example of survival of the brine shrimp (Artemia franciscana) during exposure to different salinity levels during development, we illustrate that it is not just stressor dose or exposure time but the interaction of these two factors that results in the measured phenotypic change, which itself may vary within a critical window. We additionally discuss a systems approach to critical windows, in which the components of a developing system-whether they be molecular, physiological, or morphological-may show differing responses with respect to time and dose. Thus, the plasticity of each component may contribute to a broader overall system response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据