4.8 Article

Synthesis of highly branched sulfonated polymers and the effects of degree of branching on properties of branched sulfonated polymers as proton exchange membranes

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 262, 期 -, 页码 328-337

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.03.064

关键词

Branched polymer; Poly(arylene ether)s; Oxidative stability; Proton exchange membrane; Fuel cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [51003060, 51171117, 51101103]
  2. Shenzhen Sci & Tech research grant [JC2011042 100070A, ZYC201105170225A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Branched sulfonated polymers exhibit excellent properties as proton exchange membranes (PEMs). However, very few highly branched sulfonated polymers are reported as PEMs. The highly branched polymer, including the method to increase degree of branching (DB) and the effects of DB on the properties of PEMs, should be further studied. In this work, novel branched sulfonated poly(fluorenyl ether ketone sulfone)s with different DB value are synthesized by direct polycondensation reactions from bisphenol fluorene (A(2)), sulfonated 4,4'-difluorobenzphenone, 1,3,5-tris(4-(4-fluorophenylsulfonyl) phenyl)benzene (B-3-3) and 4,4'-difluorodiphenyl sulfone. The highest DB with 10% branching agent is obtained using the B-3-3 monomer. The method to increase the DB is discussed. It is found that B-3 scaffold with long and hard arms can effectively increase the DB value. The effects of DB on the properties, including oxidative stability, proton conductivity, water uptake, swelling ratio, thermal stability, mechanical property and microstructure, are investigated. With increasing DB value, oxidative stability and proton conductivity of the membranes increase remarkably, but swelling ratio and tensile strength decrease slowly. The membrane with the highest DB value (10%) exhibits high proton conductivity (0.42 S cm(-1)) and oxidative stability (327 min), as well as relatively low swelling ratio (16.2%) at 80 degrees C. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据