4.8 Article

Simultaneous estimation of thermal parameters for large-format laminated lithium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 259, 期 -, 页码 106-116

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.079

关键词

Thermal parameters; Heat capacity; Thermal conductivity; Laminated lithium-ion battery; Joint experimental/computational techniques

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51207080]
  2. Independent Research Programs of Tsinghua University [2011Z01004]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M510436]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In-situ determination of the battery thermal parameters is important to provide accurate inputs for battery thermal models. This paper develops a method to estimate the multiple thermal parameters of large-format laminated lithium-ion batteries both simultaneously and in-situ. The central area of one battery surface is heated with a circular planar heater, while the temperature responses on the opposite surface at multiple strategically-chosen locations are recorded with the attached thermocouples. This thermal system is modeled in COMSOL v4.2 using a two-dimensional axially-symmetric thermal conduction equation containing thermal parameters such as the thermal capacity, anisotropic thermal conductivities, and thermal interfacial conductance between the Al-plastic film package and the electrode core. Using optimization techniques, these thermal parameters are adjusted step by step till the difference between the simulated and the experimental temperature responses at the corresponding locations reaches a minimum. As one validation of the developed method, the estimated specific heat capacity agreed with the value measured with an accelerating rate calorimeter within 10%. The proposed method can be applied to simultaneously determine the thermal parameters of generic objects consisting of anisotropic internal materials and an outer packaging made of different material. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据