4.8 Article

Supercapacitive performance of hierarchical porous carbon microspheres prepared by simple one-pot method

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 254, 期 -, 页码 10-17

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.12.091

关键词

Supercapacitor; Hierarchical porous carbon microsphere; Simple one-pot method; Furfuryl alcohol

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51072173, 51272221, 51302239, 21203161]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China [13JJ4051]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department [12C0395]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hierarchical porous carbon microspheres (HPCMSs) using furfuryl alcohol as carbon resource have been prepared by a simple one-pot method. The HPCMSs are characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm at 77 K, cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge/discharge tests, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and cycle life measurements in 6 M KOH. The results show that all the HPCMSs samples, which can be fabricated by adjusting the ratio of furfuryl alcohol/tetraethyl orthosilicate, possess three-dimensionally tailored pore structures with unique micro-, meso- and macroporous systems. Particularly, the HPCMS-2 prepared at the mole ratio of 2/1 (furfuryl alcohol/tetraethyl orthosilicate) shows the largest specific surface area of 709 m(2) g(-1), and the HPCMS-2 electrode owns specific capacitance as high as 221 F g(-1) at the current density of 1 A g(-1). The supercapacitor using HPCMS-2 as the active material shows high specific capacitance and excellent cycle stability, which exhibits a specific capacitance of 56 F g(-1) at the charge/discharge current density of 0.5 A g(-1). Furthermore, the HPCMS-2 supercapacitor delivers high energy densities of 6.1 Wh kg(-1) at the power density of 5000 W kg(-1), revealing a promising application in supercapacitors. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据