4.8 Article

Advanced three-component ZnO/Ag/CdS nanocomposite photoanode for photocatalytic water splitting

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 269, 期 -, 页码 466-472

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.165

关键词

Photolysis; Ag co-catalyst; Photostability; Hydrogen generation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61177061, 61177014, 61076015]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110032120070]
  3. Open Project Program of Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Information Technology, Ministry of Education (Tianjin University), Tianjin, PR China
  4. Special Foundation for Nanotechnology of the Shanghai Committee for Science and Technology [11nm0501500]
  5. Shanghai Pujiang Program [12PJ1431000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, Ag nanoparticles as co-catalysts are employed to modify the nanoscale ZnO/CdS interface to achieve a ZnO/Ag/CdS nanocomposite photoanode for photocatalytic water splitting. The three-component photoanode exhibits significantly enhanced photoelectrochemical properties as compared with the single-component (ZnO) and two-component (ZnO/Ag or ZnO/CdS) systems. The modification with Ag nanoparticles can significantly enhance the light absorption and facilitate the separation and transport of photogenerated carriers through the localized surface plasma resonance (LPSR) effect. The developed ZnO/Ag/CdS nanocomposite photoanode presents significantly improved water splitting performance, with a high hydrogen productivity up to 3.5 mL h(-1) (similar to 155 umol h(-1)) at + 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl electrode with an almost constant rate during 10 h. Even without any external bias, the photoanode can still exhibit a relatively high hydrogen productivity up to 0.5 mL h(-1). Furthermore, the nanocomposite photoanode shows excellent photocorrosion resistance, which is ascribed to a considerable decrease of surface defect density on ZnO nanowires and the reduction of holes. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据