4.8 Article

The electrochemical reactions of pure indium with Li and Na: Anomalous electrolyte decomposition, benefits of FEC additive, phase transitions and electrode performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 248, 期 -, 页码 1105-1117

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.033

关键词

Indium (In) sputtered thin films; Lithium-ion anode; Sodium-ion anode; Anomalous electrolyte decomposition; Benefits of fluoroethylene additive (FEC) additive; Very high rate performance

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Basic Energy Sciences (BES), Materials Sciences and Engineering Division
  2. ORNL's Shared Research Equipment (ShaRE) User Program
  3. DOE-BES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Indium thin films were evaluated as an anode material for Li-ion and Na-ion batteries (theoretical capacities of 1012 mAh g(-1) for Li and 467 mAh g(-1) for Na). XRD data reveal that several known Li In phases (Liln, Li3In2, LiIn2 and Li13In3) form providing 950 rnAh g(-1) reversible capacity. In contrast, the reaction with Na is severely limited (75-125 mAh g(-1)). XRD data of short-circuited cells (40 h at 65 degrees C) show the coexistence of Naln, In, and an unknown Naxln phase. In electrodes exhibit anomalous electrolyte decomposition characterized by large discharge plateaus at 1.4 V vs Li/Li+ and 0.9 V vs Na/Na+. The presence of 5 wt% fluoroethylene carbonate additive suppresses the occurrence of the electrolyte decomposition during the first cycle but does not necessarily prevent it upon further cycling. Prevention of the anomalous decomposition can be achieved by restricting the (dis)charge voltages, increasing the current or by using larger amounts of FEC. The native surface oxides (In2O3) are responsible for the pronounced electrolyte decomposition during the first cycle while other ln(3+) species are responsible during the subsequent cycles. We also show that indium electrodes can exhibit very high rate capability for both Li (100 C-rate) and Na (30 C-rate). (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据