4.8 Article

Manganese sequestration and improved high-temperature cycling of Li-ion batteries by polymeric aza-15-crown-5

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 272, 期 -, 页码 1134-1141

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.073

关键词

Manganese dissolution; Oxidation state; LixMn2O4 spinel; Capacity fade; polymeric crown ether; Aza-15-crown-5

资金

  1. NSERC Automotive Partnership Canada Program
  2. GM of Canada
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-98CH10886]
  4. Center for Synchrotron Biosciences from the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering [P30-EB-00998]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mn cation trapping by polymeric aza-15-crown-5 ethers is an effective means for mitigating the consequences of Mn dissolution in Li-ion batteries. Mn cations trapping was investigated in lithium manganese oxide (LMO) spinel-graphite (GR) cells containing 1 M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate (EC):diethyl carbonate (DEC) 1:2 v/v. A commercial polyolefin separator membrane coated with poly[divinylbenzene(vinylbenzyl-aza-15-crown-5)-vinylbenzylchloride)] effected a 39% reduction in capacity loss rate during cycling at 50 degrees C with 100% depth of discharge (DOD) at C/5 rate. Simultaneously, a 50-60% reduction in the Mn deposited at the negative electrode, and a 6x to 10x increase in the Mn on the coated separator were observed for cells with coated separators, over baseline cells with plain separators. X-ray absorption near-edge spectroscopy (XANES) yielded average oxidation states near +3 for Mn cations in graphite electrodes and separators from cycled cells, suggesting that Mn metal or in oxidation state +2 can only be minor fractions of the Mn existing outside the positive electrode. We discuss the implications of these results for choosing an optimal chelating agent. We also show that the cation chelating polymer reported here is compatible with existing manufacturing processes for Li-ion battery separators. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据