4.8 Article

Improvement of long-term cycling performance of Li[Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05]O2 by AlF3 coating

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 234, 期 -, 页码 201-207

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.045

关键词

Layered materials; Cathode materials; Dry coating; Lithium-ion batteries

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant
  2. Korea government (MEST) [2009-0092780]
  3. Human Resources Development program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant [20124010203290]
  4. Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20124010203290] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0092780] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The surface of a Li[Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05]O-2 cathode material was coated by a 50-nm thick AlF3 layer using a simple dry coating process. Although the initial discharge capacity of pristine and AlF3-coated Li [Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05]O-2 was nearly same, the AlF3-coating significantly improved the electrochemical performances of [Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05]O-2 in a full cell configuration (graphite anode), especially at an elevated temperature (55 degrees C). Furthermore, the AlF3-coated [Ni0.8Co0.15Al0.05]O-2 had better thermal stability than the pristine electrode. The improved electrochemical performance likely arose from the AlF3 coating layer which may have retarded the transition metal dissolution from HF attack. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy provided direct evidence that the AlF3 coating layer suppressed the increase in charge transfer resistance and cathode material pulverization during cycling. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据