4.8 Article

Differentiate the pseudocapacitance and double-layer capacitance contributions for nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide in acidic and alkaline electrolytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 227, 期 -, 页码 300-308

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.11.026

关键词

N-doped reduced graphene oxide; Nitrogen-containing functional group; Pseudocapacitance; Double-layer capacitance; Aqueous electrolyte

资金

  1. National Science Council of ROC-Taiwan [NSC 100-2628-E-007-028-MY2]
  2. Low Carbon Energy Research Center of National Tsing Hua University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide (N-RGO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO) have been synthesized by microwave-assisted hydrothermal method to discern the actual contribution of nitrogen-containing functional groups on the specific capacitance (C-S,C-T) in acidic and alkaline electrolytes. Material characterization reveals similar porosity, electrolyte-accessible surface area, element composition, and graphitic crystallinity between N-RGO and RGO except the difference in the nitrogen content. In 1 M H2SO4, additional pseudocapacitance provided by pyridinic-N and pyrrolic-N/pyridone-N is clearly observed at the potential negative to 0.6 V (vs. RHE) while this contribution in pseudocapacitance diminishes in 1 M KOH due to the lack of proton in the electrolyte for these basic functional groups to undergo redox reactions. The double-layer capacitance of N-RGO in 1 M H2SO4 in higher than that in 1 M KOH owing to the presence of N-containing functional groups which increase the electronic charge density of graphene and favor proton adsorption in the acidic electrolyte. The contribution of nitrogen-containing functional groups on C-S,C-T in acidic media is more pronounced than that in the alkaline electrolyte. This finding is crucial for the future application of N-doped carbons in supercapacitors to achieve full utilization. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据