4.8 Article

(Y0.5In0.5)Ba(Co,Zn)4O7 cathodes with superior high-temperature phase stability for solid oxide fuel cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 214, 期 -, 页码 7-14

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.03.050

关键词

Solid oxide fuel cells; Cathodes; Thermal expansion coefficient; Phase stability

资金

  1. Welch Foundation [F-1254]
  2. National Science Foundation MIRT [DMR-1122603]
  3. Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program of ORNL
  4. ORISE
  5. Spallation Neutron Source
  6. Division of Scientific User Facilities, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Materials Research [1122603] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

(Y0.5In0.5)BaCo4-xZnxO7 (1.0 <= x <= 2.0) oxides crystallizing in a trigonal P31c structure have been explored as alternative cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC). At a given Zn content, the (Y0.5In0.5) BaCo4-xZnxO7 compositions exhibit superior phase stability compared to YBaCo4-xZnxO7 and InBaCo4-xZnxO7 at the operating temperatures of SOFC (600-800 degrees C). In the (Y0.5In0.5)Ba(Co4-xZnx)O-7 system, the x = 1 sample offers a combination of good electrochemical performance, low thermal expansion coefficient (TEC), and enhanced chemical stability against Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9 (GDC) electrolyte while demonstrating good phase stability at 600-800 degrees C for 100 h. Optimum cathode performance could be obtained by employing (Y0.5In0.5)BaCo3ZnO7 + GDC (50:50 wt.%) composite cathodes attached at 850 degrees C for 3 h as evidenced by ac-impedance spectroscopy, and the fuel cell performance of this composite cathode was evaluated using anode-supported single cells. With a combination of excellent high-temperature phase stability, low TEC, and good electrochemical performances, the trigonal (Y0.5In0.5)BaCo3ZnO7 composition is an attractive cathode candidate for intermediate temperature SOFC. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据