4.8 Article

Kinetic analysis of carbon monoxide and methanol oxidation on high performance carbon-supported Pt-Ru electrocatalyst for direct methanol fuel cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 196, 期 7, 页码 3503-3512

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.044

关键词

Pt-Ru nanoparticles; Electrocatalysis; Methanol oxidation reaction; Temkin isotherm; Kinetic parameters

资金

  1. Spanish MEC (Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia) [NAN2004-09333-C05-03]
  2. Fundacio Pedro Pons (Universitat de Barcelona)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The kinetic parameters of carbon monoxide and methanol oxidation reactions on a high performance carbon-supported Pt-Ru electrocatalyst (HP 20% 1:1 Pt-Ru alloy on Vulcan XC-72 carbon black) have been studied using cyclic voltammetry and rotating disk electrode (RDE) techniques in 0.50M H2SO4 and H2SO4 (0.06-0.92 M) + CH3OH (0.10-1.00 M) solutions at 25.0-45.0 degrees C. CO oxidation showed an irreversible behaviour with an adsorption control giving an exchange current density of 2.3 x 10(-6) A cm(-2) and a Tafel slope of 113 mVdec(-1) (alpha = 0.52) at 25.0 degrees C. Methanol oxidation behaved as an irreversible mixed-controlled reaction, probably with generation of a soluble intermediate (such as HCHO or HCOOH). showing an exchange current density of 7.4 x 10(-6) A cm(-2) and a Tafel slope of 199 mVdec(-1) (alpha =0.30) at 25.0 degrees C. Reaction orders of 0.5 for methanol and 0.5 for proton were found, which are compatible with the consideration of the reaction between Pt-CO and Ru-OH species as the rate-determining step, being the initial methanol adsorption adjustable to a Temkin isotherm. The activation energy calculated through Arrhenius plots was 58 kJ mol(-1). practically independent of the applied potential. Methanol oxidation on carbon-supported Pt-Ru electrocatalyst was improved by multiple potential cycles, indicating the generation of hydrous ruthenium oxide, RuOxHy, which enhances the process. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据