4.8 Article

Comparative study of EC/DMC LiTFSI and LiPF6 electrolytes for electrochemical storage

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 196, 期 22, 页码 9743-9750

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.071

关键词

LiTFSI; Activated carbon; Graphite; Asymmetric supercapacitors

资金

  1. French National Agency for Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl) imide (LiTFSI) salt are potentially a good alternative to LiPF6 since it could both improve the chemical and thermal stability as salt for electrolyte. This work presents a systematic comparative study between LiFF6 and LiTFSI in a mixture of EC/DMC on the basis of some of their physicochemical properties. Transport properties (viscosity and conductivity) are compared at various temperatures from -20 to 80 degrees C. Using Walden rule, we have demonstrated that LiTFSI 1 M in EC/DMC is more ionic than LiPF6 1 M in the same binary solvent. Moreover, the electrochemical storage properties of an activated carbon electrode were investigated in EC/DMC mixture containing LiTFSI or LiFF6. The specific capacitance C-s of activated carbon was determined from the Galvanostatic charge-discharge curve between 2 and 3.7V, at low current densities. The capacitance values were found to be 100 and 90 F g(-1) respectively for LiTFSI and LiPF6 electrolytes at 2 mA g(-1). On the basis of the physicochemical and electrochemical measurements, we have correlated the improvement of the specific capacitance with activated carbon to the increase of the ionicity of the LiTFSI salt in EC/DMC binary system. The drawback concerning the corrosion of aluminium collectors was resolved by adding a few percentage of LiPF6 (1%) in the binary electrolyte. Finally, we have studied the electrochemical behavior of intercalation-deintercalation of lithium in the graphite electrode with EC/DMC+LiTFSI as electrolyte. Results of this study indicate that the realization of asymmetric graphite/activated carbon supercapacitors with LiFTSI based electrolyte is possible. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据