4.8 Article

Development and experimental validation of a dynamic thermal and water distribution model of an open cathode proton exchange membrane fuel cell

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 196, 期 9, 页码 4251-4263

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.074

关键词

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells; Water transport; Electroosmotic drag; Water diffusion; Thermal management

资金

  1. CICYT [DPI2007-62966 MICINN, DPI2010-15274 MICINN]
  2. AECID [A/026279/09]
  3. CSIC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water concentration in proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells strongly influences performance and durability which demands for fundamental understanding of water transport mechanisms. The system efficiency can be significantly improved with greater understanding of water flux dynamics through the membrane and its dependence on the internal conditions of the fuel cell. Therefore, a two-dimensional, non-isothermal, dynamic model of a 100 W open cathode, self-humidified PEM fuel cell system has been developed, that is capable of representing system specific control mechanisms for water and thermal management. The model consists of three coupled submodels based on energy, momentum and water mass balance of the system. The work is based on experimental observations of the investigated fuel cell stack, for which the crucial coefficients for water transport, namely the diffusion and the electroosmotic drag (EOD) coefficient have been determined. The diffusivity of water vapor through the MEA at 30 C was determined to be 3.3 x 10(-8) m(2) s(-1) and increases by 3 x 10(-10) m(2) s(-1) degrees C-1 up to 50 degrees C stack temperature. The EOD coefficient was measured as 0.47-0.48 water molecules per proton at stack currents from 1 to 3 A. Validation of the steady state and the dynamic model by using experimental data, directly obtained from laboratory tests, has shown that the model predictions match the experimental data well. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据