4.8 Article

Impact of SO2 poisoning of platinum nanoparticles modified glassy carbon electrode on oxygen reduction

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 196, 期 8, 页码 3722-3728

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.080

关键词

SO2; Platinum nanoparticles; Oxygen reduction; Glassy carbon

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan [19206079]
  2. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  4. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An extraordinary recovery characteristic of Pt-nanoparticles from SO2 poisoning is introduced in this study. Platinum nanoparticles (nano-Pt) modified glassy carbon electrode (nano-Pt/GC) has been compared with polycrystalline platinum (poly-Pt) electrode towards SO2 poisoning. Two procedures of recovery of the poisoned electrodes were achieved by cycling the potential in the narrow potential range (NPR, 0-0.8 V vs. Ag/AgCl/KCI (sat.)) and wide potential range (WPR, -0.2 to 1.3 V). The extent of recovery was marked using oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) as a probing reaction. SO2 poisoning of the electrodes changed the mechanism of the oxygen reduction from the direct reduction to water to the stepwise reduction involving the formation of H2O2 as an intermediate, as indicated by the rotating ring-disk voltammetry. Using the WPR recovery procedure, it was found that two potential cycles were enough to recover 100% of the activity of the ORR on the nano-Pt/GC electrode. At the poly-Pt electrode, however, four potential cycles of the WPR caused only 79% in the current recovery, while the peak potential of the ORR was 130 mV negatively shifted as compared with the fresh poly-Pt electrode. Interestingly, the NPR procedure at the nano-Pt/GC electrode was even more efficient in the recovery than the WPR procedure at the poly-Pt electrode. (c) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据