4.8 Article

Development of a Ni-Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 catalyst for solid oxide fuel cells operating on ethanol through internal reforming

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 196, 期 15, 页码 6177-6185

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.03.018

关键词

Solid oxide fuel cells; Nicke /ceria-zirconia; Ethanol steam reforming; Carbon deposition; Hydrogen production; Catalyst layer

资金

  1. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [51025209]
  2. NSFC-Guangdong [U0834004]
  3. Outstanding Young Scholar Grant at Jiangsu Province [2008023]
  4. program for New Century Excellent Talents
  5. Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation [111073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inexpensive 20 wt.% Ni-Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 catalysts are synthesized by a glycine nitrate process (GNP) and an impregnation process (IMP). The catalytic activity for ethanol steam reforming (ESR) at 400-650 degrees C, catalytic stability and carbon deposition properties are investigated. Ni-Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 (GNP) shows a higher catalytic performance than Ni-Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 (IMP), especially at lower temperatures. It also presents a better coking resistance and a lower graphitization degree of the deposited carbon. The superior catalytic activity and coke resistance of Ni-Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 (GNP) is attributed to the small particle size of the active metallic nickel phase and the strong interaction between the nickel and the Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 support, as evidenced by the XRD and H-2-TPR. The Ni-Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 (GNP) is further applied as an anode functional layer in solid oxide fuel cells operating on ethanol steam. The cell yields a peak power density of 536 mW cm(-2) at 700 degrees C when operating on EtOH-H2O gas mixtures, which is only slightly lower than that of hydrogen fuel, whereas the cell without the functional layer failed for short-term operations. Ni-Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 (GNP) is promising as an active and highly coking-resistant catalyst layer for solid-oxide fuel cells operating on ethanol steam fuel. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据