4.8 Article

High-strength all-solid lithium ion electrodes based on Li4Ti5O12

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 196, 期 15, 页码 6507-6511

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.03.045

关键词

Li-ion battery; Electrode; Li4Ti5O12; Solid electrolyte; Strength; Sintering

资金

  1. National Science Foundation Division of Materials Research [0906874]
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research through a MURI [FA9550-06-1-0326]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-07ER46453, DE-FG02-07ER46471]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Materials Research [0906931] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Materials Research [0906874] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A Li4Ti5O12-Li0.29La0.57TiO3-Ag electrode composite was fabricated via sintering the corresponding powder mixture. The process achieved a final relative density of 97% the theoretical. Relatively thick, similar to 100 mu m, electrodes were fabricated to enhance the energy density relatively to the traditional solid-state thin film battery electrodes. The sintered electrode composite delivered full capacity in the first discharge at C/40 discharge rate. Full capacity utilization resulted from the 3D percolated network of both solid electrolyte and metal, which provide paths for ionic and electronic transport, respectively. The electrodes retained 85% of the theoretical capacity after 10 cycles at C/40 discharge rate. The tensile strength and the Young's modulus of the sintered electrode composite are the highest reported values to date, and are at least an order of magnitude higher than the corresponding value of traditional tapecast composite electrodes. The results demonstrate the concept of utilizing thick all-solid electrodes for high-strength batteries, which might be used as multifunctional structural and energy storage materials. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据