4.8 Article

Characterization of direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) applications with H2SO4 modified chitosan membrane

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 195, 期 15, 页码 4915-4922

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.12.093

关键词

Chitosan membrane; Fuel cell; Methanol; Water content; Membrane resistance; Electrolyte membrane

资金

  1. Telkom Centre of Excellence VUT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chitosan (Chs) flakes were prepared from chitin materials that were extracted from the exoskeleton of Cape rock lobsters in South Africa. The Chs flakes were prepared into membranes and the Chs membranes were modified by cross-linking with H2SO4. The cross-linked Chs membranes were characterized for the application in direct methanol fuel cells. The Chs membrane characteristics such as water uptake, thermal stability, proton resistance and methanol permeability were compared to that of high performance conventional Nation 117 membranes. Under the temperature range studied 20-60 degrees C, the membrane water uptake for Chs was found to be higher than that of Nation. Thermal analysis revealed that Chs membranes could withstand temperature as high as 230 degrees C whereas Nation 117 membranes were stable to 320 degrees C under nitrogen. Nafion 117 membranes were found to exhibit high proton resistance of 284s cm(-1) than Chs membranes of 204 s cm(-1). The proton fluxes across the membranes were 2.73 mol cm(-2) s(-1) for Chs- and 1.12 mol cm(-2) s(-1) Nation membranes. Methanol (MeOH) permeability through Chs membrane was less, 1.4 x 10(-6) cm(2) s(-1) for Chs membranes and 3.9 x 10(-6) cm(2) s(-1) for Nation 117 membranes at 20 degrees C. Chs and Nation membranes were fabricated into membrane electrode assemblies (MAE) and their performances measure in a free-breathing commercial single cell DMFC. The Nafion membranes showed a better performance as the power density determined for Nation membranes of 0.0075 W cm(-2) was 2.7 times higher than in the case of Chs MEA. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据