4.8 Article

Numerical investigation of water droplet dynamics in a low-temperature fuel cell microchannel: Effect of channel geometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 195, 期 3, 页码 801-812

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.021

关键词

Fuel cell; Droplet dynamics; Microchannel; Shape; Friction coefficient; Volume-of-fluid

资金

  1. National Natural and Science Foundation of China [50876119]
  2. Natural and Science Foundation of Chongqing [CSTC, 2008BB6046]
  3. MITACS Network of Centres of Excellence
  4. Ballard Power Systems
  5. Canada Research Chair
  6. ANSYS through their Academic Partnership Program
  7. [NCET-07-0912]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sensitivity of liquid water to geometry of cathode gas microchannel in low-temperature fuel cells is investigated numerically. The two-phase flow is resolved using 3D CFD simulations with the volume-of-fluid (VOF) method. Simulations for microchannels with different cross-sections, including rectangle with aspect ratios in a range of 0.1-2, trapezoid, upside-down trapezoid, triangle, rectangle with a curved bottom wall, and semicircle are compared. The 0.5 aspect ratio rectangle yields the longest detachment time and the largest detachment diameter, whereas the longest removal time occurs for the 0.25 aspect ratio case. With decreasing aspect ratio for the rectangle the pressure drop increases and the coverage ratio decreases. The 0.1 and 2 aspect ratios rectangles have the largest water saturation. For microchannels with different cross-sections, the detachment time, detachment diameter, and removal time of the water droplet are found to be in this order: triangle < trapezoid < rectangle with a curved bottom wall < rectangle < upside-down trapezoid. The friction coefficient increases by a factor of 2-4 in the presence of water. The upside-down trapezoid yields the maximum coverage ratio and water saturation, while the rectangle with a curved bottom wall results in the minimum values. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据