4.8 Article

A polymer gel electrolyte composed of a poly(ethylene oxide) copolymer and the influence of its composition on the dynamics and performance of dye-sensitized solar cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 195, 期 4, 页码 1246-1255

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.09.008

关键词

Gel polymer electrolyte; Dye sensitized solar cells; Polyiodide formation; Transient absorption spectroscopy

资金

  1. FAPESP [06/58998-3, 08/51001-9]
  2. CNPq
  3. Renami
  4. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [06/58998-3] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A polymer gel electrolyte composed of a poly(ethylene oxide) derivative, poly(ethylene oxide-co-2-(2-methoxyethoxy) ethyl glycidyl ether), mixed with gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), Lit and I-2 is employed in dye sensitized solar cells (DSSC). The electrolyte is characterized by conductivity experiments, Raman spectroscopy and thermal analysis. The influence of the electrolyte composition on the kinetics of DSSC is also investigated by transient absorption spectroscopy (TAS). The electrolyte containing 70 wt.% of GBL and 20 wt.% of Lit presents the highest conductivity (1.9 x 10(-3) S cm(-1)). An efficiency of 4.4% is achieved using this composition. The increase in I-SC as a function of GBL can be attributed an increase in the mobility of the iodide (polyiodide) species. The increase in the yield of the intermediate species, I-2(-) originating in the regeneration reaction, is confirmed by TAS. However, the charge recombination process is faster at this composition and a decrease in the V-oc is observed. Photovoltage decay experiments confirm an acceleration in charge recombination for the DSSC assembled with the electrolyte containing more GBL. Raman investigations show that in this electrolyte the I-5(-)/I-3(-) ratio is higher. Theoretical calculations also indicate that the I-5(-) species is a better electron acceptor. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据