4.8 Article

Investigation of bio-inspired flow channel designs for bipolar plates in proton exchange membrane fuel cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 188, 期 1, 页码 132-140

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.11.123

关键词

PEM fuel cells; Bipolar plates; Flow channel design

资金

  1. 2008 Automotive Research and Industrial Mentorship (ARIM)
  2. National Science Foundation [0552737]
  3. Div Of Engineering Education and Centers
  4. Directorate For Engineering [0552737] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell performance is directly related to the flow channel design on bipolar plates. Power gains can be found by varying the type, size, or arrangement of channels. The objective of this paper is to present two new flow channel patterns: a leaf design and a lung design. These bio-inspired designs combine the advantages of the existing serpentine and interdigitated patterns with inspiration from patterns found in nature. Both numerical simulation and experimental testing have been conducted to investigate the effects of two new flow channel patterns on fuel cell performance. From the numerical simulation. it was found that there is a lower pressure drop from the inlet to outlet in the leaf or lung design than the existing serpentine or interdigitated flow patterns. The flow diffusion to the gas diffusion layer was found be to more uniform for the new flow channel patterns. A 25 cm(2) fuel cell was assembled and tested for four different flow channels: leaf, lung, serpentine and interdigitated. The polarization curve has been obtained under different operating conditions. It was found that the fuel cell with either leaf or lung design performs better than the convectional flow channel design under the same operating conditions. Both the leaf and lung design show improvements over previous designs by up to 30% in peak power density. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据