4.8 Article

Mesoporous Cr2O3 as negative electrode in lithium batteries:: TEM study of the texture effect on the polymeric layer formation

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 175, 期 1, 页码 502-509

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.09.084

关键词

mesoporous; chromium oxide; conversion; lithium battery; electron microscopy; electrochemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesoporous single crystal (PSC) oxides have been reported as presenting higher electrochemical performances than bulk materials in lithium ion batteries operating via intercalation processes. Here, we extend this study to the electrochemical behaviour of mesoporous Cr2O3 versus Li+/Li-0. We confirm that the Cr2O3 reacts towards Li through a conversion reaction mechanism leading, upon discharge, to the formation of large metallic chromium nanoparticles (10 nm); the latter are embedded into a Li2O matrix together with, in this specific case, a copious amount of polymeric materials coming from electrolyte degradation, surrounding the particles, and filling the pores. During the following charge, re-oxidation of the nanoparticles occurs with the formation of CrO1-x, with the main difference, as opposed to bulk Cr2O3 electrodes, being the preservation of the polymeric layer at the end of the charge. We believe the material mesoporosity, via capillary effects, to be at the origin of such a difference. These electrolyte degradation products are shown to help in maintaining the material mesoporosity for a great number of cycles; and interestingly they are not detrimental to the cell performance in terms of capacity retention while presenting great advantages in terms of charge transfer by reducing diffusion lengths, namely for Li+ ions. The positive attributes of mesoporous material-based electrodes noticed for insertion reactions can then be extended to conversion reaction electrodes as long as we can master their synthesis while controlling their mesoporosity through either soft or hard templating techniques. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据