4.8 Article

Fabrication and investigation of SiO2 supported sulfated zirconia/Nafion® self-humidifying membrane for proton exchange membrane fuel cell applications

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 184, 期 1, 页码 197-203

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.019

关键词

proton exchange membrane fuel cell; self-humidifying membrane; Nafion (R); silicon oxide supported sulfated zirconia; proton conductivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20476104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A self-humidifying composite membrane based on Nafion (R) hybrid with SiO2 supported sulfated zirconia particles (SiO2-SZ) was fabricated and investigated for fuel cell applications. The bi-functional SiO2-SZ particles, possessing hygroscopic property and high proton conductivity, were homemade and as the additive incorporated into our composite membrane. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier infrared spectrum (FT-IR) techniques were employed to characterize the structure of SiO2-SZ particles. Scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) measurements were conducted to study the morphology of composite membrane. To verify the advantages of Nafion (R)/SiO2-SZ composite membrane, the IEC value, water uptake, proton conductivity, single cell performance and areal resistance were compared with Nafion (R)/SiO2 membrane and recast Nafion (R) membrane. The single cell employing our Nafion (R)/SiO2-SZ membrane exhibited the highest peak power density of 0.98 Wcm(-2) under dry operation condition in comparison with 0.74 Wcm(-2) of Nafion (R)/SiO2 membrane and 0.64 Wcm(-2) of recast Nafion (R) membrane, respectively. The improved performance was attributed to the introduction of SiO2-SZ particles, whose high proton conductivity and good water adsorbing/retaining function under dry operation condition, could facilitate proton transfer and water balance in the membrane. Crown Copyright (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据